Holy Terror?

A student in one of my School of Faith courses asked me to explain how terrorism could possibly be justified as doing “God’s will.” I think that’s an important issue for us to explore if we want to address the problem at its root.

Obviously this issue arises in the context of Islam, since at least some adherents of that religion support—and act upon—the notion that terrorism can be justified as an act of jihad, or “holy war.”

Pope Benedict XVI addressed this complex issue in his widely publicized 2006 lecture at Regensburg University in Germany. The Pope stressed Christianity’s view that God is intrinsically linked to reason. The Greek word for reason, rationality, and intelligibility is logos, which is commonly translated as verbum (Latin) or “word” (English) in Scripture. In fact, Christ is presented as the eternal Word of God incarnate. We see that point clearly made at the outset of the fourth Gospel:

“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. . . .  And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, full of grace and truth; we have beheld his glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father” (Jn. 1:1, 14). 

I should clarify here that the God of Christianity is not mere rationality personified, but rather is more fundamentally a Father who acts in the objectively best interests of His children. Christ is the eternal Son of God who came to reveal the Father’s saving love for us.

Islam, on the other hand, stresses God’s absolute transcendence. The God of Islam immeasurably exceeds our limited human comprehension. That’s certainly true, at least to a point, as we all can agree that God’s ways are not our ways. But the Muslim people do not see in Christ God’s incarnate love for man, which has led God to make Himself known to us. Instead, according to the Holy Father, Islam teaches that God’s “will is not bound up with any of our categories, even that of rationality.”

The risk of this image of the divine is that the irrationality of violence can potentially be justified if someone believes it is “God’s will” or the “will of Allah.”

So the question boils down to whether God can and does act irrationally (or super-rationally). We say no, but Islam says yes.

As Pope John Paul II stressed in his book Crossing the Threshold of Hope, at the heart of the fall of Adam and Eve is the rejection of God’s fatherhood. Pope Benedict, in his Regensburg lecture, was trying to explain how all this has played out on a philosophical level. He offers Christianity as a means of bridging the gap between an “extreme” faith without reason (“fundamentalism” or “fideism”) and “extreme” (and often impoverished) reason without faith (“materialism,” “secularism,” etc.).

Without some common ground, there simply is no basis for Islam and the secular West to understand each other and work toward the common good.

For the secularist, the rejection of God’s fatherhood is a rejection of God altogether, though such rejection is typically accompanied by idolatry (e.g., consumerism, hedonism, etc.) and diversions (e.g., TV). The former seeks to fill the void left by God, the latter seeks to ignore the emptiness. 

For the Muslim, God is not a Father but rather a tyrant or task master in the sense that His sovereign will is not tethered to rationality or “the good.” God is so far removed from man that it’s offensive to Muslims even to suggest that that God may be our “Father.”

That’s the amazing thing about our faith. When Christ teaches us to pray, the first words out of His mouth are “Our Father.” And when He sends His Holy Spirit into our hearts, we instinctively call out “Abba, Father!” (Gal. 4:6) and become participants in God’s inner life (cf. 2 Pet. 1:4).

Muslims need reason. The decadent West needs God. And all of us need Jesus Christ, who shows us the way to the Father.

One response

  1. Ladies and Gentlemen,
    The world is in a three way struggle between Christendom, Islam and Atheist Humanism. Of course, we here at this forum all know the end of the story: Jesus Christ triumphs. However, Dr. Jerry Pournelle’s thoughts (written at the end of August in 2006) on the intervening events between now and then when victory is acheived deserve to be read and contemplated upon:
    The Partition of Mankind
    http://www.jerrypournelle.com/archives2/archives2view/view429.html#Thursday
    We are in an essential repeat of the Battle of Leponto in 1565:
    http://www.traditioninaction.org/History/A_001_Lepanto.html
    Europe was in a three way struggle between the Catholic Church in southern and western Europe, the Protestant separatists in northern Europe and the Ottoman invasion into eastern Europe. It appeared as though Satan a strangle-hold on Holy Mother Church. But the gates of hell did not prevail: the Islamists were defeated and Protestant separatist encroachment countered (hence the Council of Trent during this period of time).
    We now find ourselves, however, with an enemy in our own midst: the atheist humanists who pretend to be concerned about social justice and the common good while advocating the “right” to commit infanticide of the unborn. And at the same time we face the same sort of Islamic fanatics who threatened Europe all those centuries ago. We know that Jesus Christ wins in the end. But we need to pray and seek God’s face to ensure that we remain on the winning side – the side of Eternal Love and Eternal Justice.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *